Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

3 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 20:05, updated 9 h ago

Iran holds 'very good' talks with Mecca pact nations on region's security

Article analysis

3out of 10

Band BLocalised faults

Reports the Tehran talks with attribution throughout and quotes multiple parties; the headline quotes Iran's characterisation, and the narration has only minor descriptive adjectives.

Three of the three outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, one framing

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 3 of 3

Iran security chief says 'very good discussions' held with Mecca pact countries - Region - World

Ahram Online

How the 3 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 1
    1
  2. G2
    HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.
    0
  3. G3
    Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.
    0
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.
    0
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.
    0
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 3
    1
  7. G7
    Missing contextNecessary background is present.
    0

Evidence

1Word choiceReporter voice

heavyweight Saudi Defence Minister

Mildly evaluative descriptor in narration, though it reflects common wire style.

2Word choiceReporter voice· not scored

Pakistan's powerful army chief

Evaluative adjective in reporter voice, a conventional wire descriptor.

3Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice

Fresh explosions rattled Riyadh overnight, which has suffered weeks of attacks from the Iran-backed Houthis

The scope of the attacks is narrated without a source, though it is widely reported background.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 = 1
G1 = 1, below 2: not band D
Not band C or A: band B
Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 3

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method