6 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 13:54, updated 14 min ago
Israel continued Gaza genocide after truce: UN
Photo: The Globe and Mail
Article analysis
Band BLocalised faults
The Globe and MailStated as fact
Headline foregrounds the genocide finding with trailing attribution, while the body attributes claims carefully and gives Israel's rejection and its ambassador's statement substantive space.
One of the six outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.
The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.
1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning
The same event, three framings
The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.
Neutral 1 of 6
যুদ্ধবিরতির পরও গাজায় গণহত্যা চালিয়ে গেছে ইসরায়েল: জাতিসংঘের তদন্ত কমিশন
Kalbela
Stated as fact 4 of 6
UN inquiry accuses Israel of extermination in West Bank and continuing Gaza genocide despite ceasefire
Arab News
In quotation marks 1 of 6
Israel 'genocide' has continued in Gaza after ceasefire, UN report claims
Sky News
How the 3 was worked out
The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.
-
G1
Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 21
-
G2
HeadlineCompresses or intensifies, but the claim stays attributed. Evidence 11
-
G3
Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.0
-
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.0
- G5 1
-
G6
Unattributed claimsEvery disputable claim is attributed.0
-
G7
Missing contextNecessary background is present.0
Evidence
1Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice
Israel continued genocide in Gaza after ceasefire, UN inquiry finds
Headline states genocide as the main clause, with only trailing attribution to the inquiry and Israel's rejection omitted.
2Word choiceReporter voice
Israel’s assault on Gaza
'Assault' is a mildly charged characterisation in the paper's narration.
3Word choiceParaphrased source voice
a broader strategy to exterminate and displace Palestinians
Strong charge, attributed to the commission chair.
4Word choiceAttributed quote voice
genocidal acts with the genocidal intent
Grave legal language quoted from the report, not the paper's own.
Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 1 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 = 2 G1 = 1, below 2: not band D Not band C or A: band B Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 3
Every headline, in order
-
Arab News Middle East First to report Stated as fact
-
The Globe and Mail
US & Canada
Analysed above
Stated as fact
Israel continued genocide in Gaza after ceasefire, UN inquiry finds
-
bdnews24.com
Bangladesh
Stated as fact
-
Mail & Guardian
Africa
Stated as fact
UN inquiry finds Israel continued genocide in Gaza after ceasefire
About this method
Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.
What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.
Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.