Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

5 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 15:00, updated 18 h ago

নামের পার্থক্য থাকলেও, আ.লীগ-বিএনপির চরিত্র এক: গোলাম পরওয়ার

Golam Parwar says Awami League and BNP share same character

Photo: Daily Naya Diganta

Neutral summary

from 3 outlets' reporting

Mia Golam Parwar, secretary general of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami and a former MP, said at a seminar in Dhaka's National Press Club on Monday (26 October) that the Awami League and BNP differ only in name, with the same character, citing extortion, killings, land grabbing and control of committees, which he said continue as before. He called on the government to revive the case over the 28 October 2006 killings and arrest the perpetrators, alleging the Awami League government withdrew the case in 2009. He accused BNP leader Tarique Rahman of reneging on a 'yes' vote in the referendum and alleged a constitutional amendment process bypassed the opposition. Jamaat assistant secretary general Hamidur Rahman Azad said the BNP government had reversed reforms made by the interim government and weakened independent institutions, and that there was no difference between the two parties' conduct.

Where accounts differ. Sarabangla.net reports the remarks without the Awami League-era case-withdrawal allegation and the Shekh Mujib and Hasina history passages, which only Naya Diganta and Dhaka Post carry; Naya Diganta and Dhaka Post also attribute the 2006 case withdrawal to the Hasina government in 2009, a claim not in Sarabangla.net.

Daily Naya DigantaDhaka PostSarabangla.net

Written by AI from these outlets' articles: facts they report, claims attributed, numbers checked against the sources. It may still contain errors; read the originals.

Article analysis

6out of 10

Band COne-sided, no editorial voice

Relays a Jamaat seminar's grave accusations against BNP and Awami League entirely through its speakers, attributed headline, with no response from the accused and one unattributed martyr label.

Four of the five outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The reporter's own narration carries no evaluation, which keeps it out of the top band (8 to 10).

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, two framings

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 4 of 5

আওয়ামী লীগ ও বিএনপির মধ্যে নামের পার্থক্য, চরিত্র এক : মিয়া গোলাম পরওয়ার

Daily Naya Diganta

Stated as fact 1 of 5

আওয়ামী লীগ ও বিএনপি'র মধ্যে নামের পার্থক্য, চরিত্র সব এক

Dhaka Post

How the 6 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 5
    1
  2. G2
    HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.
    0
  3. G3
    Other side missingThe other side is absent, with no sign a response was sought. Evidence 4 6
    3
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationAllegation of crime, violence or grave moral fault. Evidence 1 4
    3
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesQuoted invective carries most of the article's judgement. Evidence 1 2 3
    2
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 5
    1
  7. G7
    Missing contextMinor context is missing. Evidence 6
    1

Evidence

1Ad hominemAttributed quote voice

হাসিনার সন্ত্রাসীরা হায়েনার মতো

Dehumanising invective against Awami League activists inside a quote.

2Word choiceAttributed quote voice

গাদ্দারি করার এমন নজির পৃথিবীর কোথাও নেই

Charged accusation of betrayal against Tarique Rahman in quoted speech.

3Word choiceParaphrased source voice

কতটা গণতন্ত্রবিরোধী, ক্ষিপ্ত, সন্ত্রাসী ও বর্বর হলে

Loaded labels carried in reported speech of the speaker.

4CoverageReporter voice

বর্তমান বিএনপি সরকারও সংশ্লিষ্ট অধ্যাদেশগুলো সংসদে সংখ্যাগরিষ্ঠতার জোরে বাতিল করেছে

BNP and Awami League are accused of fascism, killings and conspiracy with no response sought or signposted.

5Word choiceReporter voice

২৮ অক্টোবর ২০০৬-এর শহীদ

Reporter narration uses শহীদ for contested 2006 deaths without attribution.

6Source selectionReporter voice

বিশেষ অতিথির বক্তব্যে জামায়াতের সহকারী সেক্রেটারি জেনারেল

All speakers are from one party's event, relayed without corroboration.

7Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice· not scored

আওয়ামী লীগ ও বিএনপির মধ্যে নামের পার্থক্য, চরিত্র এক

Headline carries the speaker's charge but is attributed via colon.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 = 10
G1 = 1, below 2: not band D
G3 ≥ 2, and G2, G5 or G6 ≥ 2: band C
Band C: S ≤ 12 gives 6, 13 or more gives 7. Score 6

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method