Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

3 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 13:25, updated 16 h ago

‘ক্রসফায়ার’ নিয়ে আইজিপির বক্তব্য: বিভিন্ন দল ও সংগঠনের নিন্দা

parties and organisations condemn IGP's crossfire remarks

Photo: The Daily Waadaa

Article analysis

This article has not been scored yet.

Each story's lead article is scored automatically. Scoring any other outlet's article on request is coming for members.

The same event, two framings

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 2 of 3

Rights groups condemn IGP’s crossfire remarks

New Age

Stated as fact 1 of 3

Rights groups call IGP’s crossfire remarks a threat to rule of law, demand his removal

The Daily Waadaa

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method