5 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 06:08, updated 2 h ago
নেতানিয়াহুর সঙ্গে ইসরাইলি সেনাপ্রধানের বিরোধ, নেপথ্যে কী?
Israeli army chief dispute with Netanyahu what lies behind it
Photo: Amar Desh
Article analysis
Band BLocalised faults
Amar DeshNeutral
Headline asserts a Netanyahu–army chief dispute as fact despite his denial in the body; narration otherwise attributes claims and includes denials and opposition views.
Five of the five outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.
The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.
1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning
The same event, one framing
The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.
Neutral 5 of 5
Netanyahu denies reports of clash with Israeli army chief over Iran-linked operation ahead of election
Dawn
How the 3 was worked out
The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.
-
G1
Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 21
-
G2
HeadlineAsserts a contested claim in the paper's voice. Evidence 32
-
G3
Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.0
-
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.0
-
G5
Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.0
-
G6
Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 11
-
G7
Missing contextNecessary background is present.0
Evidence
1Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice
সামরিক কর্মকর্তাদের মধ্যে উদ্বেগ রয়েছে
Concern about electoral exploitation is attributed only to unnamed military officials, with no specific source.
2Word choiceReporter voice
নেতানিয়াহু দাবি করেন
Uses 'claimed' for Netanyahu's statements where 'said' would carry the same information; mild, and common usage.
3Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice
ইসরাইলের সেনাপ্রধান ও নেতানিয়াহুর বিরোধ
The headline asserts the dispute as fact, although the body reports that Netanyahu denies it and the claim rests on TV channel sources.
Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 2 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 = 3 G1 = 1, below 2: not band D Not band C or A: band B Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 3
Every headline, in order
-
Dawn
South Asia
First to report
Neutral
-
Amar Desh
Bangladesh
Analysed above
Neutral
-
Jugantor
Bangladesh
Neutral
-
Daily Naya Diganta
Bangladesh
Neutral
About this method
Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.
What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.
Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.