Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

13 sourcesFirst reported Sun 25 Oct at 17:41, updated 15 h ago

ভারতীয় উচ্চপর্যায়ের গোয়েন্দা কর্মকর্তার সঙ্গে গোলাম পরওয়ার গোপন বৈঠক করেছেন: রাশেদ খান

Golam Parwar secretly met senior Indian intelligence officer Rashed Khan says

Photo: Jugantor

Neutral summary

from 4 outlets' reporting

Md Rashed Khan, political assistant to Prime Minister Tarique Rahman, alleged in a Facebook post on Monday that Jamaat-e-Islami Secretary General Mia Golam Porwar and party leader A T M Ma'sum held a secret meeting with a senior Indian intelligence official. He said the meeting took place on October 16 after Maghrib prayers at a house in Baridhara, Dhaka, with three people attending. Rashed questioned the purpose of meeting an Indian intelligence officer, called on Porwar to clarify the meeting, and said otherwise Jamaat would be considered to be conspiring against the state. He alleged the meeting aimed to plan a Jamaat movement together with the Awami League. The articles do not report any response from Porwar or Jamaat.

Where accounts differ. Outlet 2 gives the meeting date as October 16 and Outlet 1 and 3 identify Rashed's post date differently, but no outlet gives a conflicting account of the allegation itself; no outlet reports a response from Porwar or Jamaat.

Daily BangladeshJugantorBanglanews24.comThe Daily Waadaa

Written by AI from these outlets' articles: facts they report, claims attributed, numbers checked against the sources. It may still contain errors; read the originals.

Article analysis

6out of 10

Band COne-sided, no editorial voice

Relays a government aide's social-media accusation that Jamaat leaders secretly met Indian intelligence and conspire against the state, attributed throughout but with no response from the accused.

Eleven of the thirteen outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The reporter's own narration carries no evaluation, which keeps it out of the top band (8 to 10).

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, two framings

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 11 of 13

ভারতীয় শীর্ষ গোয়েন্দার সঙ্গে গোলাম পরওয়ারের গোপন বৈঠক, দাবি রাশেদের

Jago News 24

In quotation marks 2 of 13

‘ভারতীয় উচ্চপর্যায়ের গোয়েন্দা কর্মকর্তার সঙ্গে পরওয়ারসহ ৩ জামায়াত নেতার গোপন বৈঠক’

Bangla Tribune

How the 6 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceNarration is descriptive throughout.
    0
  2. G2
    HeadlineCompresses or intensifies, but the claim stays attributed. Evidence 1
    1
  3. G3
    Other side missingThe other side is absent, with no sign a response was sought. Evidence 2
    3
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationAllegation of crime, violence or grave moral fault. Evidence 2 3
    3
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesQuoted invective carries most of the article's judgement. Evidence 3 5
    2
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsEvery disputable claim is attributed.
    0
  7. G7
    Missing contextMinor context is missing. Evidence 4
    1

Evidence

1Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice

ভারতীয় উচ্চপর্যায়ের গোয়েন্দা কর্মকর্তার সঙ্গে গোলাম পরওয়ার গোপন বৈঠক করেছেন: রাশেদ খান

Headline states the secret meeting as a declarative claim, attributed only by a trailing colon tag, compressing the body's 'অভিযোগ করেছেন'.

2CoverageReporter voice

বলে অভিযোগ করেছেন প্রধানমন্ত্রীর রাজনৈতিক সহকারী রাশেদ খান

Jamaat and Golam Parwar are accused of a secret meeting with foreign intelligence but are not quoted, and the article gives no sign a response was sought.

3Word choiceParaphrased source voice

রাষ্ট্রের বিরুদ্ধে গভীর ষড়যন্ত্রে লিপ্ত হয়েছে জামায়াত

Conspiracy-against-the-state accusation is the source's rhetoric, reported without amplification.

4Source selectionReporter voice

সামাজিক যোগাযোগ মাধ্যমে এক স্ট্যাটাসে তিনি এ অভিযোগ করেন

A single partisan Facebook status is relayed without corroboration.

5Ad hominemParaphrased source voice

যদি নৈতিক রাজনীতি করে থাকে

The source questions Parwar's ethics; this is attributed to the source, not the paper's narration.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 1 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 0 + 1 = 10
G1 = 0, below 2: not band D
G3 ≥ 2, and G2, G5 or G6 ≥ 2: band C
Band C: S ≤ 12 gives 6, 13 or more gives 7. Score 6

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method