Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

10 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 03:20, updated 2 h ago

Officials from Makkah pact countries to meet Iranian officials on Monday, two sources say

Photo: bdnews24.com

Article analysis

3out of 10

Band BLocalised faults

Attributes the planned meeting to anonymous sources in headline and body, notes requests for comment, and adds one unattributed analytical line about the conflict's destabilising role.

Ten of the ten outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, one framing

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 10 of 10

Top officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday, two sources say

Reuters

How the 3 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 1
    1
  2. G2
    HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.
    0
  3. G3
    Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.
    0
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.
    0
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.
    0
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 1
    1
  7. G7
    Missing contextNecessary background is present.
    0

Evidence

1OpinionatedReporter voice

increasingly destabilising element in the US-Israeli offensive against Iran, turning US ally Saudi Arabia into a pressure point

Analytical characterisation of the conflict's role stated in reporter voice without attribution.

2Emotional sensationalismReporter voice· not scored

continued unabated

Mild intensifier describing the fighting without quantification.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 = 1
G1 = 1, below 2: not band D
Not band C or A: band B
Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 3

Every headline, in order

  1. Reuters Europe First to report Neutral

    Top officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran on Monday, two sources say

    Headline changed 2 times; now Officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran 26 Oct, 08:53

  2. The Straits Times Asia Pacific Analysed above Neutral

    Top officials from Mecca Pact countries to meet Iranian officials in Tehran: Sources

    Headline changed; now Officials from Mecca pact countries to meet Iranian officials on Oct 26, two sources say 26 Oct, 06:50

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method