3 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 01:49, updated 9 h ago
ব্রাজিলের নির্বাচনে লুলার জয়
lula wins brazil election
Photo: Dainik Azadi
Article analysis
Band DEditorialising in its own voice
Dainik AzadiNeutral
Factual headline, but narration repeatedly interprets the result and US motives in its own voice, asserting White House preferences and disappointment without sources.
Three of the three outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.
The paper's own narration evaluates, which places it in the top band.
1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning
The same event, one framing
The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.
Neutral 3 of 3
Lula wins reelection in Brazil, halting Latin America’s rightward shift
The Washington Post
How the 8 was worked out
The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.
- G1 2
-
G2
HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.0
-
G3
Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.0
-
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.0
-
G5
Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.0
- G6 2
-
G7
Missing contextNecessary background is present.0
Evidence
1OpinionatedReporter voice
সামান্য ব্যবধানেই স্পষ্ট যে, দেশের প্রায় অর্ধেক মানুষ লুলার বামপন্থি মতাদর্শের বিরুদ্ধে অবস্থান নিয়েছে
Interprets vote share as ideological opposition in the paper's voice without attribution.
2OpinionatedReporter voice
লাতিন আমেরিকায় ডানপন্থার সামপ্রতিক উত্থান রুখে দিয়েছেন লুলা
Evaluative geopolitical framing stated as fact by the reporter.
3ProjectionReporter voice
ট্রাম্প প্রশাসন একজন ডানপন্থি নেতাকেই নেতৃত্বে দেখতে বেশি পছন্দ করত সেটি নিয়ে সন্দেহের অবকাশ নেই
Attributes preferences to the Trump administration without evidence.
4Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice
হোয়াইট হাউজ লাতিন আমেরিকাকে নিজেদের প্রভাববলয় মনে করে
Claim about White House views stated without source.
5Word choiceReporter voice
সবচেয়ে কট্টর ডানপন্থি কংগ্রেসকে
Superlative charged label for Congress in reporter voice, unsourced.
6MagnitudeReporter voice
বিশাল সব পথসমাবেশ ও সামাজিক যোগাযোগমাধ্যমে ব্যাপক প্রচারের
Unquantified scale words.
7Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice
হোয়াইট হাউজ কিছুটা হতাশ হলেও
White House disappointment asserted without source.
Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 0 = 2 G1 = 2, at least 2: band D Band D: set by G1 and S. Score 8
Every headline, in order
-
The Washington Post
US & Canada
First to report
Neutral
Lula wins reelection in Brazil, halting Latin America’s rightward shift
-
Dainik Azadi
Bangladesh
Analysed above
Neutral
About this method
Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.
What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.
Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.