16 sourcesFirst reported Sat 24 Oct at 17:29, updated 1 d ago

নির্বাচনের আগে নেতানিয়াহু সরকারের বিরুদ্ধে ইসরায়েলে হাজারো মানুষের বিক্ষোভ

thousands protest in israel against netanyahu government before election

Photo: Prothom Alo

Article analysis

4out of 10

Band BLocalised faults

Al Jazeera Arabic17:29Neutral

Reports the protest and Likud's broadcast petition descriptively in headline and narration, but never gives Netanyahu's government a voice on its refusal of an official inquiry.

Fifteen of the sixteen outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.

Read the original See the working

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, two framings

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 15 of 16

آلاف الإسرائيليين يتظاهرون ضد نتنياهو قبل أيام من الانتخابات

Al Jazeera Arabic17:29

Stated as fact 1 of 16

নেতানিয়াহু সরকারের বিরুদ্ধে ব্যাপক বিক্ষোভ

Desh Rupantor01:38

How the 4 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

G1
Reporter's own voiceNarration is descriptive throughout.
0
G2
HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.
0
G3
Other side missingThe other side is absent, with no sign a response was sought. Evidence 2
3
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationPolicy criticism or disagreement. Evidence 2
1
G5
Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.
0
G6
Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 3
1
G7
Missing contextNecessary background is present.
0

Evidence

1MagnitudeHeadline voice· not scored

آلاف الإسرائيليين

Crowd size given without a source, though modest and plausible.

2CoverageReporter voice

ويواجه نتنياهو انتقادات داخل إسرائيل بشأن الإخفاقات الأمنية والاستخبارية

Netanyahu's government is criticised throughout, but no response from it or Likud on the inquiry demand is included.

3Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice

الإخفاقات الأمنية والاستخبارية التي سبقت الهجوم

Failures are narrated as background fact, although they are widely acknowledged.

Show the calculation

S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 3 + 1 + 0 + 1 + 0 = 5
G1 = 0, below 2: not band D
Not band C or A: band B
Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 4

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method