16 sourcesFirst reported Sat 24 Oct at 17:29, updated 23 h ago

নির্বাচনের আগে নেতানিয়াহু সরকারের বিরুদ্ধে ইসরায়েলে হাজারো মানুষের বিক্ষোভ

thousands protest in israel against netanyahu government before election

Photo: Prothom Alo

Article analysis

5out of 10

Band BLocalised faults

Prothom Alo03:40Neutral

Headline reports the protest plainly; narration is descriptive with sourced media reports, but the government's response to accountability demands is absent and one expectation is attributed to no one.

Fifteen of the sixteen outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.

Read the original See the working

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, two framings

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 15 of 16

آلاف الإسرائيليين يتظاهرون ضد نتنياهو قبل أيام من الانتخابات

Al Jazeera Arabic17:29

Stated as fact 1 of 16

নেতানিয়াহু সরকারের বিরুদ্ধে ব্যাপক বিক্ষোভ

Desh Rupantor01:38

How the 5 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

G1
Reporter's own voiceNarration is descriptive throughout.
0
G2
HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.
0
G3
Other side missingThe other side is absent, with no sign a response was sought. Evidence 3
3
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationAllegation of misconduct, bad faith or incompetence. Evidence 3
2
G5
Loaded quotesSome evaluative words in quotes, in proportion to the event. Evidence 3
1
G6
Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 1 2
1
G7
Missing contextNecessary background is present.
0

Evidence

1MagnitudeReporter voice

হাজারো মানুষ বিক্ষোভ করেছেন

Crowd size given without a source for the estimate.

2Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice

তিনি তুলনামূলক কম আগ্রহী হবেন বলে মনে করা হচ্ছে

Agentless 'it is thought' attributes an expectation to no identifiable source.

3CoverageReporter voice

হামাসের হামলা ঠেকাতে সরকারের ব্যর্থতার জবাবদিহি দাবি করে আসছে সংগঠনটি

Government accused of security failure; no government or Likud response included or sought.

4OpinionatedReporter voice· not scored

ইসরায়েলের এবারের নির্বাচন বেশ গুরুত্বপূর্ণ

Mild evaluative assessment in reporter voice, though supported by following explanation.

Show the calculation

S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 1 + 0 = 7
G1 = 0, below 2: not band D
Not band C or A: band B
Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 5

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method