Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

8 sourcesFirst reported Fri 23 Oct at 12:24, updated 3 d ago

জামায়াত আমিরের অ্যাকাউন্ট হ্যাকড: তদন্তে দীর্ঘসূত্রতা

jamaat ameer account hacked investigation delayed

Photo: Prothom Alo

Neutral summary

from 5 outlets' reporting

Prothom Alo reported that eight months after a complaint about the hacking of the Jamaat-e-Islami ameer's X account, the devices used in the investigation have not yet reached the Detective Branch of police. The complainant, Sirajul Islam, reportedly refuses to hand them over over security concerns and wants forensic examination in his presence; a forensic report on the device of arrested suspect Sharwar Alam is also unavailable. Separately, Jugantor, Amar Desh, Banglavision and Desh TV reported, citing a statement signed by Jamaat's central publicity department senior assistant Mujibul Alam on Saturday (24 October), that a criminal gang hacked the WhatsApp account of deputy ameer Prof. Mujibur Rahman MP. The party urged well-wishers to avoid any financial transactions through the account and to verify requests.

Where accounts differ. Prothom Alo describes an X account hack under investigation, while Jugantor, Amar Desh, Banglavision and Desh TV report only a WhatsApp account hack announced by the party, with no mention of the investigation or arrest.

Prothom AloAmar DeshJugantorBanglavisionDesh TV

Written by AI from these outlets' articles: facts they report, claims attributed, numbers checked against the sources. It may still contain errors; read the originals.

Article analysis

4out of 10

Band BLocalised faults

Headline states the hack as fact though the body calls it an allegation; narration is largely descriptive but asserts unattributed concern about the accused's career.

Eight of the eight outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, one framing

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 8 of 8

জামায়াত আমিরের অ্যাকাউন্ট হ্যাকড: তদন্তে দীর্ঘসূত্রতা

Prothom Alo

How the 4 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 3
    1
  2. G2
    HeadlineAsserts a contested claim in the paper's voice. Evidence 1 2
    2
  3. G3
    Other side missingThe other side is present, but only as a token line. Evidence 4
    1
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.
    0
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.
    0
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 3
    1
  7. G7
    Missing contextMinor context is missing. Evidence 4
    1

Evidence

1Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice

জামায়াত আমিরের অ্যাকাউন্ট হ্যাকড

Headline states the hacking as fact while the body describes it only as an allegation (হ্যাকের অভিযোগ).

2Word choiceHeadline voice

তদন্তে দীর্ঘসূত্রতা

'Protracted delay' is an evaluative characterisation, though the eight-month timeline in the body partly supports it.

3Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice

এতে ছরওয়ারের চাকরিজীবন নিয়েও উদ্বেগ বাড়ছে

Rising concern is asserted without saying whose concern it is.

4Cherry pickingReporter voice

গ্রেপ্তারকৃত আসামি ছরওয়ারে আলমের

The arrested accused and the police are not quoted on the delay or the charges.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 2 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 1 = 5
G1 = 1, below 2: not band D
Not band C or A: band B
Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 4

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method