Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

5 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 14:35, updated 4 h ago

ভুয়া বিলে রেলওয়ের ৯৬ লাখ টাকা আত্মসাৎ, ১৪ জনের বিরুদ্ধে দুদকের মামলা

Anti-Corruption Commission sues fourteen over ninety six lakh taka railway fraud

Photo: Daily Bangladesh

Article analysis

6out of 10

Band COne-sided, no editorial voice

Headline states the embezzlement as fact while the body carefully attributes it to the ACC case; the named accused are not quoted or contacted.

Five of the five outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The reporter's own narration carries no evaluation, which keeps it out of the top band (8 to 10).

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, one framing

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 5 of 5

ভুয়া বিলে রেলওয়ের প্রায় ৯৭ লাখ টাকা আত্মসাৎ, দুদকের মামলা

Desh Rupantor

How the 6 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceNarration is descriptive throughout.
    0
  2. G2
    HeadlineAsserts a contested claim in the paper's voice. Evidence 1
    2
  3. G3
    Other side missingThe other side is absent, with no sign a response was sought. Evidence 2
    3
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationAllegation of crime, violence or grave moral fault. Evidence 2
    3
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.
    0
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsEvery disputable claim is attributed.
    0
  7. G7
    Missing contextNecessary background is present.
    0

Evidence

1Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice

ভুয়া বিলে রেলওয়ের ৯৬ লাখ টাকা আত্মসাৎ

Headline states embezzlement as fact, though the body attributes it to the ACC case allegation.

2CoverageReporter voice

মামলার আসামিরা হলেন-

Fourteen named accused are listed without any response from them or their institutions, and the article gives no sign a response was sought.

3Source selectionReporter voice· not scored

দুদকের অনুসন্ধানে উঠে এসেছে

The account relies solely on the ACC's filing and investigation findings.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 2 + 3 + 3 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 8
G1 = 0, below 2: not band D
G3 ≥ 2, and G2, G5 or G6 ≥ 2: band C
Band C: S ≤ 12 gives 6, 13 or more gives 7. Score 6

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method