4 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 07:39, updated 10 h ago
দ্রুত বিশ্ব ইজতেমার তারিখ ঘোষণাসহ সাদপন্থিদের ৪ দাবি
sad faction demands four points including early announcement of world ijtema date
Photo: Jugantor
Article analysis
Band BLocalised faults
JugantorNeutral
Attributed headline and narration relay a Saad-faction press conference, including accusations of threats and political interference against rivals who are never asked to respond.
Four of the four outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.
The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.
1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning
The same event, one framing
The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.
Neutral 4 of 4
বিশ্ব ইজতেমার তারিখ ঘোষণাসহ চার দফা দাবি সাদপন্থিদের
Risingbd.com
How the 5 was worked out
The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.
-
G1
Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 31
-
G2
HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.0
- G3 3
-
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationAllegation of misconduct, bad faith or incompetence. Evidence 12
-
G5
Loaded quotesSome evaluative words in quotes, in proportion to the event. Evidence 11
-
G6
Unattributed claimsEvery disputable claim is attributed.0
-
G7
Missing contextMinor context is missing. Evidence 41
Evidence
1CoverageReporter voice
জুবায়েরপন্থীরা বাধা দেন। এবারও তারা প্রকাশ্যে হুমকি দিচ্ছেন।
Zubayer faction and Hefazat are accused of obstruction and threats but no response from them is included or sought.
2Source selectionReporter voice
হেফাজতে ইসলামের একটি অংশ এ কাজ করছে
Only the Saad faction's press conference is relayed without corroboration.
3Word choiceReporter voice
তাবলিগ জামাত বাংলাদেশের মূলধারার বিশ্ব ইজতেমার
The contested 'mainstream' self-label of the Saad faction appears in narration describing the event's purpose, though it echoes the organisers' framing.
4Cherry pickingReporter voice
সব হত্যাকাণ্ডের বিচার
Killings referenced without background on the 2024 Tongi clash context.
Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 3 + 2 + 1 + 0 + 1 = 7 G1 = 1, below 2: not band D Not band C or A: band B Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 5
Every headline, in order
-
Risingbd.com
Bangladesh
First to report
Neutral
-
Daily Vorer Pata
Bangladesh
Neutral
-
Jugantor
Bangladesh
Analysed above
Neutral
-
Samakal
Bangladesh
Neutral
About this method
Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.
What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.
Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.