4 sourcesFirst reported yesterday at 05:45, updated 19 min ago
এ বছর মাথাপিছু জিডিপিতে আবার ভারতের চেয়ে এগিয়ে যাবে বাংলাদেশ
Bangladesh will again surpass India in per capita GDP this year
Photo: Prothom Alo
Article analysis
Band BLocalised faults
Headline turns an IMF forecast into a certainty without attribution; the body is a balanced, sourced comparison with one unsourced inequality claim and a mild evaluative close.
Four of the four outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.
The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.
1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning
The same event, one framing
The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.
Neutral 4 of 4
এ বছর মাথাপিছু জিডিপিতে আবার ভারতের চেয়ে এগিয়ে যাবে বাংলাদেশ
Prothom Alo
How the 3 was worked out
The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.
-
G1
Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 31
-
G2
HeadlineCompresses or intensifies, but the claim stays attributed. Evidence 11
-
G3
Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.0
-
G4
Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.0
-
G5
Loaded quotesQuotes are informational.0
-
G6
Unattributed claimsOne or two disputable claims are unattributed. Evidence 21
-
G7
Missing contextNecessary background is present.0
Evidence
1Headline-body attribution mismatchHeadline voice
এ বছর মাথাপিছু জিডিপিতে আবার ভারতের চেয়ে এগিয়ে যাবে বাংলাদেশ
Headline states as certain ('যাবে') what the body presents as an IMF forecast ('হতে পারে'), without attribution.
2Unsubstantiated claimReporter voice
প্রবৃদ্ধির সুফল সবাই সমানভাবে পায়নি; বরং সম্পদ ধারাবাহিকভাবে ধনী পরিবারগুলোর হাতে কেন্দ্রীভূত হয়েছে।
Material claim about rising inequality in both countries stated as fact with no source.
3OpinionatedReporter voice
অর্থনৈতিক অগ্রগতির গুরুত্বপূর্ণ দিক
Mild evaluative conclusion in the paper's own voice.
Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 = 2 G1 = 1, below 2: not band D Not band C or A: band B Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 3
Every headline, in order
-
Prothom Alo
Bangladesh
Analysed above
Neutral
এ বছর মাথাপিছু জিডিপিতে আবার ভারতের চেয়ে এগিয়ে যাবে বাংলাদেশ
Headline changed; now
মাথাপিছু জিডিপিতে আবার ভারতকে ছাড়াবে বাংলাদেশ
26 Oct, 06:50 -
Samakal
Bangladesh
Neutral
About this method
Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.
What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.
Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.