Tuesday, 27 October 2026 Updated hourly from 226 outlets
Pricing Sign in

5 sourcesFirst reported Sat 24 Oct at 23:07, updated 54 min ago

UK PM Burnham says he wants to discuss a return to EU freedom of movement

Photo: Al Jazeera English

Article analysis

3out of 10

Band BLocalised faults

Headline accurately reports Burnham's stated wish; narration is largely descriptive with attributed quotes, ONS data and an opposition reaction, marred only by a slightly loaded 'even touted'.

Three of the five outlets that covered this event headlined it neutrally.

The faults are local; the reporter's narration stays descriptive.

1 Straight reporting10 Campaigning

The same event, two framings

The earliest headline of each kind. Marked words are judgements in the headline itself: stated as fact or in quotation marks.

Neutral 3 of 5

UK PM Burnham says he wants to discuss a return to EU freedom of movement

Al Jazeera English

In quotation marks 2 of 5

Andy Burnham says he wants ‘honest discussion’ about freedom of movement with EU

The Guardian

How the 3 was worked out

The model answers seven fixed questions from 0 to 3 and cites evidence for each. The score is calculated from the answers in code, so any disagreement points to one question.

  1. G1
    Reporter's own voiceOne isolated evaluative word in the reporter's voice. Evidence 1
    1
  2. G2
    HeadlineReports the event or the speech act; contested claims are attributed.
    0
  3. G3
    Other side missingEvery party involved responds substantively.
    0
  4. G4
    Weight of the unanswered allegationNo allegation against an identifiable party.
    0
  5. G5
    Loaded quotesSome evaluative words in quotes, in proportion to the event. Evidence 3
    1
  6. G6
    Unattributed claimsEvery disputable claim is attributed.
    0
  7. G7
    Missing contextNecessary background is present.
    0

Evidence

1Word choiceReporter voice

who has even touted the possibility

'even touted' adds an evaluative, faintly incredulous framing where 'raised' would be neutral.

2Word choiceReporter voice· not scored

anti-immigration Reform UK party

Labels Reform UK with a characterising descriptor in the paper's voice, though commonly used.

3Ad hominemAttributed quote voice

total betrayal of Brexit Britain

Farage's charged rhetoric is quoted, proportionate as a single opposing reaction.

4ProjectionReporter voice· not scored

who is trying to find ways to speed up the UK economy

Attributes a motive in narration, though a mild and widely stated policy aim.

Show the calculation
S = G2 + … + G7 = 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 0 + 0 = 1
G1 = 1, below 2: not band D
Not band C or A: band B
Band B: S ≤ 3 gives 3, 4 to 6 gives 4, 7 or more gives 5. Score 3

Every headline, in order

About this method

Method. Bias types follow the Table of Media Bias Elements and the Media Bias Taxonomy (both CC BY 4.0). The impartiality rules follow the BBC Editorial Guidelines and the Ofcom Broadcasting Code. This analysis was made by claude-opus-5-5 on rubric 1.0.0. The score is calculated from the seven answers, never generated.

What this is not. No outlet gets a standing bias rating, and there is no left/right axis, because that axis does not describe Bangladeshi politics. Each analysis covers one article about one event. Members' analytics count how each outlet's headlines were labelled over a chosen period, with the number of headlines behind every share, and also show the average score of an outlet's scored articles: that average describes those articles (mostly each story's lead), not the outlet, and outlets are never ranked by it or by any share.

Known limits. Headlines are grouped into stories automatically, so an unrelated headline sometimes slips in; it is shown faded rather than hidden. Where outlets carry the same wire copy, the comparison has little to show. Human annotators agree on bias in Bangla news only moderately (κ = 0.574 at best), which limits what any automated score can claim.

The full method